In the session that I observed on Monday the first five minutes were different from the ones Newkirk suggested. The introduction of student and tutor went very quickly. Then they went straight into the paper. Unlike the examples Newkirk used, the student led this session. I suppose the agenda was set by the student. However, I was unsure about what the goal of the session was because the student was very confident about her paper and did not want to change anything. I don't know if this makes the session contradictory to Newkirk's examples.
Newkirk's ideas can be realistic in certain situations. Not all students will be as willing and open to talk about their writing. Especially if they dont even want to be there. His ideas could work if the tutor has become familiar with the student's work in a session and the student openly tells the tutor what he/she thinks can be changed. Using skill, the tutor can then concentrate on adressing the student's concerns. Then that becomes the agenda. As far as this happening in the first five minutes, that can be a little idealistic. Comfort levels for interaction will vary. Some students take a bit longer to grow comfortable with a tutor they are meeting for the first time. In the examples Newkirk uses, they are meeting with their professor who they have had classes with and one teacher-student conference already.
Last Day of Class
-
I am in my office if you need to ask questions. For details on grading, see
earlier posts.
I am hoping to have your portfolios finished by Sunday night. Ch...
15 years ago
